yabs.io is a smart bookmarking online service. It tends to replace del.icio.us RIP.
yabs.io allows saving of bookmarks for long time, with a great ability to tag bookmarks, save links, retrieve links by searching and by tags. Saving bookmarks in private mode or in public mode. Exporting and Importing bookmarks in an easy way, like JSON and XML / RSS.
What can behavioural scientists do differently when working on complex problems?
Given the need for differentiated methods for different kinds of systems, and particular caution about existing approaches for complex and chaotic domains, applied behavioural scientists should be considering the appropriateness of the cornerstones of applied work, such as defining target behaviours. early on in strategic development, as shown in the table below.
The Cynefin framework is a ‘sense-making’ framework – where sense-making is defined by the author David Snowden as “making sense of the world in order to act in it”. It distinguishes between 3 primary systems: ordered, complex, chaotic, which are defined by the type of constraints (or absence of constraints) in that system. Each type of system is described not just how it is constrained, but also describes how to best take action.
What can behavioural scientists do differently when working on complex problems?
Given the need for differentiated methods for different kinds of systems, and particular caution about existing approaches for complex and chaotic domains, applied behavioural scientists should be considering the appropriateness of the cornerstones of applied work, such as defining target behaviours. early on in strategic development, as shown in the table below.
The Cynefin framework is a ‘sense-making’ framework – where sense-making is defined by the author David Snowden as “making sense of the world in order to act in it”. It distinguishes between 3 primary systems: ordered, complex, chaotic, which are defined by the type of constraints (or absence of constraints) in that system. Each type of system is described not just how it is constrained, but also describes how to best take action.
Fundamentals of Inclusive Research
Presenter(s): Cherish Boxall, Heidi Green, Frances Sherratt, Shaun Treweek
decorative image to accompany text
This guide provides four approaches to making research more inclusive.
Groups of people, such as those from minoritised/racialised ethnicities, impaired capacity, and those experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, generally experience poorer health outcomes than groups of people with more societal privilege. In parallel, these groups have been historically underserved in health research. This situation means that the findings of health research might not be transferable to the people who stand to benefit most, potentially allowing health inequalities to continue and most definitely not contributing to solving the problem of inequity.
There are many historical and current reasons for under-representation in research. The most common reasons include a lack of trust and ease of access (e.g., small visit windows, cover for dependants). Although different groups might face unique barriers, this practical resource will provide a starting place to help research be more inclusive through a broad suite of approaches.
The four pillars of the fundamentals of inclusive research are access, relevance, trust and recognition.
> Download the workbook PDF with a check guide to get started on inclusive practice and community engagement.
